Top 20 User Interviews Interview Q&A For UX Researchers (Updated Nov, 2024)

If you’re preparing for a remote UX researcher position, you’ll most likely face user interviews interview questions.

User interviews are the heart of UX research, providing invaluable insights that guide decision-making throughout the design process.

In this article, I’ll help you answer the most common questions you might encounter in a UX researcher interview related to user interviews.

These questions are tailored to assess your knowledge, experience, and problem-solving skills, ensuring that you can easily navigate around this topic in your upcoming interview.

Let’s begin!

Disclosure: Please note that some of the links below are affiliate links and at no additional cost to you, I’ll earn a commission. Know that I only recommend products and services I’ve personally used and stand behind.

1. What is the purpose of conducting user interviews in UX research?

User interviews are an indispensable tool in UX research, serving multiple crucial purposes.

Firstly, they provide an opportunity to gain profound insights into the minds and behaviors of users.

By engaging in meaningful conversations with participants, researchers can uncover hidden needs, pain points, motivations, and desires that might not be apparent through other data collection methods.

Secondly, user interviews play a pivotal role in humanizing data.

While quantitative data can provide statistical trends, user interviews offer the qualitative context needed to understand the “why” behind the numbers.

They allow researchers to delve deep into user experiences, discovering the emotional and cognitive aspects that drive decision-making and user satisfaction.

Thirdly, user interviews guide the design process.

The insights garnered from these interviews inform and validate design decisions, ensuring that the resulting products or interfaces are not only functional but also resonate with users on a personal level.

This alignment between user expectations and design choices is the hallmark of successful UX design.

2. Can you explain the key differences between user interviews and surveys as research methods?

User interviews and surveys are both valuable research methods, but they differ significantly in their approach, scope, and the type of data they generate.

In case of user interviews, interviews are qualitative, providing in-depth, open-ended insights. They involve open-ended questions and encourage participants to share their experiences, feelings, and opinions.

Researchers can adapt questions in real-time and explore unexpected avenues of inquiry. Interviews allow for a deep exploration of user experiences, motivations, and behaviors within a specific context.

User interviews typically involve a smaller number of participants due to the time-intensive nature of the method. The user interviews provide rich, nuanced data but may be more time-consuming and resource-intensive.

In case of user surveys, quantitative data are gathered, yielding numerical results. User surveys consist of closed-ended questions with predefined response options.

User surveys are efficient for collecting data from a large number of participants. They provide statistical insights and are useful for understanding broad trends and preferences.

User surveys can accommodate larger participant pools. The responses are standardized, making data analysis more straightforward.

In essence, user interviews excel at uncovering deep, qualitative insights from a smaller, carefully selected group of participants, while user surveys efficiently collect quantitative data from a larger, more generalized audience.

3. How do you determine the right participants for a user interview?

I begin by developing user personas that represent our target audience. Personas are fictional characters embodying the characteristics, needs, and goals of your typical users.

I also consider demographics such as age, gender, location, occupation, and other relevant factors that align with our user personas.

I utilize appropriate recruitment channels to find participants who match our criteria. These channels may include user testing platforms, social media groups, email lists, or existing user databases.

I design screening questions that filter out participants who don’t fit our criteria. These questions helps identify potential participants who closely align with our personas.

I strive for diversity within our chosen participant group to capture a broader range of perspectives. Diversity ensures a more comprehensive understanding of our user base.

I also consider offering incentives such as gift cards, discounts, or other rewards to motivate participation.

I ensure participants understand the purpose of the interview, their rights, and how their data will be used. I obtain their informed consent before proceeding.

Moreover, I make scheduling as flexible as possible to accommodate participants’ availability.

4. What are some common biases or pitfalls to avoid when conducting user interviews?

As a researcher, I recognize the inherent human tendency to seek out information that confirms preconceived notions. To counteract this bias, I approach each interview with an open and unbiased mindset.

I craft questions neutrally, avoiding any leading language that might steer participants toward desired answers. This approach ensures that I’m genuinely listening to participants’ responses rather than seeking validation of my assumptions.

The halo effect can cloud objectivity by allowing one positive trait or aspect of a participant to disproportionately influence my overall perception of their feedback.

To mitigate this, I consciously focus on holistic assessments. I consider a participant’s responses in their entirety, weighing both positive and negative aspects equally.

By doing so, I avoid letting one standout trait unduly sway my interpretation of their insights.

Participants may sometimes provide responses they believe are socially acceptable or desirable, rather than their true thoughts and experiences.

To encourage candid responses, I create a non-judgmental and safe interview environment.

I emphasize the confidentiality of their responses, assuring them that their honest feedback is invaluable in improving the product. This reassurance often leads to more authentic and useful insights.

Poorly phrased questions can inadvertently lead participants to certain responses. I take great care in crafting questions that are clear, concise, and devoid of assumptions.

Before the interview, I thoroughly review my question script to ensure that each question is designed to elicit unbiased and genuine responses.

To avoid sampling bias, I pay close attention to the recruitment process. I make sure that the participants I select closely match the demographics and characteristics of our target user base.

By striving for diversity and representativeness in my participant pool, I can be confident that the insights gathered are more likely to reflect the broader user population.

Participants may sometimes feel compelled to please the researcher or provide answers they perceive as expected. To uncover genuine insights, I use probing techniques effectively.

I ask follow-up questions that encourage participants to expand on their initial responses, delving deeper into their thoughts and experiences. This approach often reveals valuable insights that might have remained hidden behind surface-level responses.

In today’s globalized world, it’s essential to be sensitive to cultural differences that can affect communication and interpretation. To address this, I adapt my approach to be culturally sensitive and inclusive.

I research and respect cultural norms and preferences, ensuring that the interview process is respectful of participants’ diverse backgrounds.

By actively addressing these biases and pitfalls throughout the user interview process, I aim to gather more accurate and meaningful insights that ultimately drive informed design decisions.

5. Describe the typical structure or format of a user interview.

I begin by introducing myself and establishing a warm, welcoming atmosphere. I clearly state the purpose of the interview and express my gratitude for the participant’s time and willingness to contribute.

This initial rapport-building sets the tone for a comfortable and open dialogue.

To help participants feel at ease, I initiate the interview with warm-up questions. These questions are intentionally easy to answer and often relate to participants’ backgrounds or interests.

This phase serves to build trust and establish a connection between us.

Transitioning from rapport building, I move on to the core questions designed to gather insights pertinent to the research objectives.

These questions are open-ended, allowing participants to provide detailed responses and share their perspectives freely.

Throughout the interview, I employ probing techniques to delve deeper into participants’ responses.

I ask follow-up questions to clarify any ambiguous points and explore specific areas of interest. This approach ensures that I capture comprehensive and nuanced insights.

Depending on the research goals, I may present participants with relevant scenarios or tasks related to the product or design in question.

This step helps me understand their thought processes, decision-making criteria, and how they interact with the proposed solutions.

As the interview concludes, I summarize the key takeaways and insights shared by the participant. I also provide an opportunity for participants to offer any additional insights or questions they might have.

This debrief reinforces the importance of their contributions and encourages them to reflect on the discussion.

Before concluding the interview, I invite participants to ask questions or provide feedback on the interview process itself.

This ensures that participants feel heard and valued, and it clarifies any lingering doubts or concerns they may have.

I also outline the next steps in the research process and explain any compensation or incentives if applicable.

Finally, I express gratitude once more for the participant’s time and valuable contributions.

This concluding gesture reinforces the collaborative nature of the interview and leaves participants with a positive impression.

6. How do you develop effective interview questions to gather valuable insights from users?

I start with warm-up questions to build rapport and ease participants into the conversation. These questions are typically easy to answer and relate to the participant’s background or experiences.

I align my questions with the specific research objectives. Understanding what insights I aim to gain helps in crafting focused questions.

I ensure that my questions are open-ended, allowing participants to provide detailed and unrestricted responses. This encourages them to share their thoughts, feelings, and experiences.

I use neutral and non-biased language in my questions to prevent leading participants toward certain answers. It’s essential to maintain objectivity.

I steer clear of jargon or technical terms that participants may not understand. Clear and simple language ensures that everyone can engage in the conversation comfortably.

I structure questions in a logical flow, starting with broad inquiries and progressively diving into more specific topics. This approach helps participants feel at ease and gradually delve into deeper insights.

I also incorporate probing techniques to follow up on interesting responses, seeking clarification or asking for additional details. Probing enriches the conversation and uncovers hidden insights.

Before the actual interviews, I pilot test my questions with a small group to refine them. Feedback from pilot interviews helps me fine-tune the wording and flow.

By following these steps, I ensure that my interview questions are thoughtfully designed to elicit valuable insights from users while creating a comfortable and engaging interview experience.

7. What techniques do you use to establish rapport and build trust with interview participants?

I start by warmly welcoming participants, introducing myself, and expressing gratitude for their willingness to participate. This sets a positive tone for the interview.

I practice active listening throughout the interview, showing genuine interest in what participants are sharing. This involves maintaining eye contact, nodding, and providing verbal cues like “I see” or “Tell me more.”

I use empathetic body language to convey understanding and empathy. Leaning in slightly, maintaining an open posture, and mirroring participants’ emotions help establish a connection.

I assure participants that their thoughts and opinions are valued, emphasizing that there are no right or wrong answers. This non-judgmental approach encourages open sharing.

I am transparent about the interview process, explaining how the insights will be used and emphasizing the confidentiality of their responses.

Throughout the interview, I acknowledge participants’ contributions by thanking them for sharing their insights and experiences. This reinforces their importance in the research process.

I try to find common ground with participants, whether it’s shared experiences, interests, or goals. This commonality fosters a sense of connection.

If participants express discomfort or hesitation, I am flexible and patient, allowing them to steer the conversation in a direction they are more comfortable with.

By incorporating these techniques, I create an environment where participants feel comfortable, respected, and valued, ultimately leading to more open and honest responses.

8. What strategies do you employ to ensure that user interviews remain engaging and informative for participants throughout the session?

I begin by clearly outlining the purpose of the interview and the topics we’ll cover. This provides participants with a roadmap for the discussion, ensuring they understand what to expect.

I use a mix of question types, including open-ended, hypothetical, and scenario-based questions. This variety keeps the conversation dynamic and prevents it from becoming monotonous.

I actively listen to participants’ responses and ask follow-up questions that demonstrate I’m genuinely interested in their insights. This creates a conversational flow and encourages participants to share more.

Depending on the nature of the research, I may use visual aids like prototypes, wireframes, or user journey maps.

These visuals help participants better understand concepts and provide feedback more effectively.

For longer interviews, I incorporate short breaks to prevent participant fatigue. These breaks allow participants to recharge and maintain focus.

I periodically summarize key points and insights which helps participants see the progression of the interview and reinforces the value of their contributions.

I remain empathetic throughout the session, acknowledging any challenges or frustrations participants may express. This empathy fosters a positive atmosphere.

I encourage participants to share real-life stories and anecdotes related to the topic. Personal narratives often provide richer insights and keep the interview engaging.

In some cases, I involve participants in collaborative problem-solving exercises, where we brainstorm solutions together. This empowers them and adds an interactive element to the interview.

At the end of the interview, I ask participants for feedback on the interview process itself. Their insights can be valuable for improving future sessions.

9. How do you handle difficult or uncooperative participants during an interview?

I remain calm and composed, regardless of the participant’s behavior. My demeanor sets the tone for the interaction.

I actively listen to the participant’s concerns or frustrations. Sometimes, they may have valid reasons for their behavior.

I express empathy by acknowledging the participant’s feelings and concerns. This helps defuse tension and shows that I value their perspective.

If a participant is uncooperative due to discomfort or misunderstanding, I rephrase questions or provide context to make them feel more at ease.

If the conversation veers off track or becomes unproductive, I gently redirect it back to the research objectives.

I respect participants’ boundaries. If they decline to answer a question, I move on without pressing further.

If a participant appears visibly uncomfortable or agitated, I offer short breaks to give them a chance to regroup.

I maintain objectivity throughout the interview and avoid taking any challenging behavior personally.

After the interview, I reflect on the interaction and consider whether any adjustments are needed in future interviews or if there are lessons to be learned.

Overall, the goal is to create an environment where participants feel heard and respected, even in challenging situations. This approach often leads to more productive conversations.

10. Can you give an example of a successful user interview project you’ve conducted and the impact it had on the product?

Sure, one particularly impactful user interview project involved a mobile app redesign for a travel booking platform.

The travel booking platform had been experiencing a decline in user engagement and a rise in customer complaints. The goal was to revamp the app’s user interface and overall experience to reverse this trend.

I conducted a series of user interviews with both frequent and infrequent app users. The interviews focused on their experiences with the existing app, pain points, and their expectations for a travel booking app.

The interviews yielded several key insights. Users expressed frustration with the cluttered interface and difficulty in navigating the app.

They also desired more personalized travel recommendations and an easier booking process.

Based on these insights, the design team implemented significant changes. They streamlined the app’s interface, prioritized essential features, and introduced personalized travel suggestions based on user preferences.

The impact was remarkable. After the app redesign, user engagement surged by 30%, and the number of customer complaints dropped significantly.

Users praised the app’s new, user-friendly design, which led to increased bookings and higher user satisfaction.

11. How do you ensure that the insights from user interviews are effectively communicated to the product team?

Immediately after conducting user interviews, I meticulously document all findings, categorizing them by themes and significance.

This documentation serves as the foundation for sharing insights.

To make the insights relatable, I craft compelling narratives around user personas.

By presenting insights in the context of specific user journeys and personas, I help the product team empathize with users’ needs and challenges.

Visual aids, such as charts, graphs, and journey maps, are powerful tools for conveying complex data concisely. I create visual representations of key findings to illustrate trends and pain points effectively.

I leverage direct quotes from participants to add authenticity and emotional resonance to the insights. These quotes provide a direct voice from the users, reinforcing the significance of the findings.

Not all insights are of equal importance. I prioritize findings based on their impact on user experience and alignment with project objectives. High-impact insights take center stage during presentations.

I facilitate regular debrief sessions with the product team to discuss findings, share insights, and encourage open dialogue. These sessions foster collaboration and ensure that the entire team is aligned.

When presenting insights, I use user-centric language, emphasizing how changes align with users’ needs and preferences.

This helps the product team see the direct connection between insights and design decisions.

I also provide clear and actionable suggestions for design improvements, making it easy for the product team to translate insights into tangible changes.

I welcome feedback and questions from the product team during and after the presentation. This iterative approach encourages discussions and ensures that any uncertainties or clarifications are addressed promptly.

After insights are shared, I follow up with the product team to track progress on implementing changes based on the findings.

This ensures that the insights remain at the forefront of the design process.

By following these steps, I ensure that insights from user interviews are not only effectively communicated but also actively integrated into the product development cycle, resulting in user-centered design decisions that drive product success.

12. What methods do you employ to analyze and synthesize data gathered from user interviews?

Initially, I transcribe interview recordings, ensuring that every participant’s responses are accurately documented. Transcriptions provide a textual foundation for analysis.

I then conduct thematic analysis, which involves identifying recurring themes, patterns, and key takeaways from the interviews. I use software tools like NVivo to assist in this process.

To humanize the data and make it relatable to the design team, I create user personas based on common characteristics and behaviors observed in the interviews.

I develop user journey maps to visualize the user experience, highlighting pain points, emotions, and touchpoints where improvements are needed.

User interviews often reveal specific user needs and pain points. I distill these insights into user stories, ensuring that the design team has a clear understanding of what needs to be addressed.

I leverage direct quotes and anecdotes from participants to add a human touch to the data presentation. These quotes often resonate deeply with stakeholders and make the insights more impactful.

Finally, I prioritize the identified insights based on their impact, feasibility, and alignment with project goals. This ensures that design decisions are driven by the most critical user needs.

By employing this comprehensive approach to data analysis and synthesis, I ensure that the insights from user interviews are translated into actionable recommendations that guide the design and development process effectively.

13. Have you used any software or tools to streamline the user interview process, and if so, which ones?

Yes, I have utilized several software tools to streamline the user interview process and enhance its efficiency.

Platforms like UserTesting and UserZoom have been invaluable for participant recruitment, scheduling, and data collection. They simplify the process of finding suitable participants and managing interview sessions.

Services like Rev provide fast and accurate transcription of interview recordings, saving time and ensuring that the data is easily accessible for analysis.

Tools like Lookback allow for in-depth video analysis, enabling me to review participant reactions, body language, and facial expressions, which can provide additional insights beyond verbal responses.

I use note-taking apps like Evernote or OneNote during interviews to jot down key points, observations, and follow-up questions in real-time, ensuring that nothing is missed.

To analyze and organize interview data, I rely on data analysis software such as NVivo, which facilitates thematic analysis and helps identify patterns and trends.

14. How do you prioritize the findings from user interviews to inform product design decisions?

I evaluate each finding’s potential impact on the user experience and product success. High-impact insights, such as those related to usability issues or critical pain points, receive top priority.

I consider how closely each insight aligns with the project’s objectives and goals. Insights that directly address project objectives are prioritized to ensure alignment.

I assess the feasibility of implementing changes based on each insight. Feasible changes, whether in terms of development resources or timeline, are more likely to be prioritized.

Insights that align with the core principles of user-centered design, such as improving user satisfaction or meeting user needs, are given priority.

I cross-validate findings by comparing them with other research data, such as usability testing results or quantitative data, to ensure their consistency and reliability.

I involve stakeholders in the prioritization process, gathering their input and considering their perspectives, as their expertise can provide valuable insights.

By systematically considering these factors, I create a prioritized list of actionable insights that serve as a roadmap for the design team, ensuring that design decisions are driven by user needs and project objectives.

15. Can you describe a situation where you had to pivot your research approach during a user interview project? What was the outcome?

There was a notable instance in a user interview project for a healthcare app where I had to pivot my research approach.

Initially, our research focus was on understanding how users navigated the app to access medical information and schedule appointments.

However, during the early interviews, it became evident that participants were frequently mentioning issues related to data security and privacy.

Recognizing the importance of these unexpected insights, I decided to pivot our research approach to delve deeper into users’ concerns about data security and privacy within the app.

I probed further with follow-up questions to gather specific details about their worries and expectations regarding data protection.

The outcome of this pivot was a set of critical insights that had been overlooked in the initial research plan.

Users were genuinely concerned about their health data privacy, and they expected robust encryption measures and clear data usage policies from the app.

Armed with these insights, we adjusted the app’s design to prominently communicate its commitment to data security and implemented additional security features.

The result was a significant boost in user trust and engagement. User feedback indicated that they felt more confident using the app, leading to increased user retention and positive reviews highlighting the app’s commitment to data privacy.

This experience reinforced the importance of remaining adaptable in UX research and seizing opportunities to explore unexpected insights, as they can lead to impactful improvements in product design and user satisfaction.

16. What ethical considerations do you keep in mind when conducting user interviews, especially in terms of data privacy and consent?

I always begin by explaining the purpose of the interview, the data I’ll collect, and how it will be used. Participants must provide informed and voluntary consent before we proceed.

To protect participants’ privacy, I remove or anonymize any personally identifiable information (PII) from interview transcripts and data. This ensures that their responses cannot be linked back to them personally.

I emphasize the confidentiality of participants’ responses. I assure them that their insights will be used solely for research purposes and will not be shared with unauthorized individuals or entities.

I take measures to safeguard the data collected during interviews, such as using secure storage methods and encryption where necessary.

I respect participants’ boundaries and avoid delving into personal or sensitive topics unless they are directly related to the research objectives. I maintain a professional and non-intrusive approach throughout the interview.

Participants have the right to withdraw from the interview at any time without consequences. I make this clear and ensure they feel comfortable exercising this right.

I maintain transparency throughout the research process, addressing any questions or concerns participants may have. Transparency builds trust and reinforces ethical research practices.

By adhering to these ethical principles, I aim to conduct user interviews that not only yield valuable insights but also prioritize the well-being and rights of the participants.

17. How do you handle sensitive or personal information that may come up during user interviews?

If sensitive information arises during an interview, I first acknowledge its significance and express empathy toward the participant.

I reassure them that their privacy is a top priority, and I’ll handle the information with the utmost care.

Next, I evaluate whether the sensitive information is directly relevant to the research objectives.

If it isn’t, I gently steer the conversation back to the research topic, respecting the participant’s boundaries.

However, if the sensitive information is pertinent to the research, I proceed cautiously.

I ask for the participant’s explicit consent to discuss the topic further, ensuring they understand the implications and are comfortable continuing.

Throughout this process, I maintain a non-judgmental and empathetic demeanor, emphasizing that the participant’s comfort and well-being are of utmost importance.

I handle any sensitive data with strict confidentiality, ensuring it is anonymized and stored securely.

By following these steps, I aim to strike a balance between collecting valuable insights and safeguarding the privacy and dignity of the participants.

18. Describe a time when you encountered unexpected insights during a user interview and how you adapted your research strategy as a result.

During one memorable user interview for a travel booking platform redesign, I encountered an unexpected insight that fundamentally altered our research strategy and design direction.

As I engaged with a participant, they shared a unique frustration related to the booking process.

While we had initially focused on improving the user interface and search functionality, this participant highlighted an entirely different pain point: the lack of travel recommendations based on user preferences and past bookings.

Recognizing the significance of this insight, I adapted my approach on the spot. I probed further to understand their needs and expectations regarding personalized recommendations.

The participant’s feedback resonated with subsequent interviewees, indicating a clear pattern.

In response to this unexpected insight, I recommended a pivot in our research strategy. We shifted our focus to explore the feasibility of implementing a recommendation engine within the platform.

This shift had a profound impact on our project, leading to the development of a feature that greatly enhanced the user experience and engagement.

This experience reinforced the importance of remaining flexible during user interviews, being open to unexpected insights, and adapting research strategies accordingly.

It also highlighted the power of user interviews to uncover unmet needs and drive innovative design solutions.

19. How do you ensure that your user interviews remain focused and on track during the conversation?

Before the interview, I establish a clear set of research objectives and a well-defined agenda. This ensures that both the participant and I have a shared understanding of what we aim to achieve during the conversation.

I use a structured approach to my questioning, beginning with introductory and rapport-building questions. As the interview progresses, I gradually move from general inquiries to more specific and in-depth questions.

This structured progression keeps the conversation organized and ensures that all relevant topics are covered.

Actively listening to participants is a fundamental aspect of maintaining focus. I pay close attention to their responses, allowing them to share their thoughts fully.

When necessary, I use active listening techniques like nodding, paraphrasing, and follow-up questions to encourage elaboration.

I allocate specific timeframes for different sections of the interview. This helps prevent any one topic from dominating the conversation, ensuring that all relevant areas are explored within the given time constraints.

If a participant raises a critical point or follows an unexpected but valuable direction, I’m open to adapting the interview structure to explore these insights further. This adaptability ensures that valuable findings are not overlooked.

While it’s important to be adaptable, I also keep the conversation from straying too far from the research objectives. If a participant goes off on tangents that are not relevant, I gently steer the conversation back on track.

Periodically summarizing the key points discussed helps keep both the participant and me on the same page.

This reinforces the focus on critical topics and allows the participant to clarify any misunderstood points.

At the end of the interview, I revisit the objectives and ensure that we’ve covered all the essential areas.

This not only reinforces the interview’s focus but also provides a last opportunity for participants to share any additional insights.

20. How do you stay updated on best practices and new trends in user interview techniques and UX research in general?

I regularly read industry-specific blogs, articles, and publications from reputable sources like Nielsen Norman Group, Smashing Magazine, and UX Design Institute.

These sources offer insights into the latest research methodologies, case studies, and best practices.

I attend UX and research-focused conferences, both in-person and virtual. Events like the UX Research Summit and UX Design Institute’s webinars provide opportunities to learn from experts and network with peers.

I actively participate in UX-related online communities and forums such as UX Stack Exchange and UX Design Community.

These platforms facilitate discussions, knowledge sharing, and exposure to diverse perspectives.

I also maintain a strong professional network by connecting with other UX researchers on platforms like LinkedIn. Engaging in discussions, sharing insights, and seeking advice from colleagues helps me stay current.

Furthermore, I enroll in relevant courses and workshops offered by organizations like Coursera, Interaction Design Foundation, and local UX meetups. These resources cover a wide range of UX topics, including user interviews.

I also collaborate closely with colleagues and team members, sharing research findings, attending design reviews, and participating in cross-functional meetings.

This ensures that I’m exposed to diverse viewpoints and stay aligned with our product development goals.

Moreover, I actively seek feedback on my research methodologies and interview techniques from peers and stakeholders.

Final Thoughts On User Interviews Interview Q&A

I hope this list of user interviews interview questions and answers provides you an insight on the likely topics that you may face in your upcoming interviews.

As you prepare for your user interviews interview, remain curious, ethical, and data-driven, and you’ll be well-prepared to showcase your expertise in the world of user interviews and UX research.

Check out our active list of various remote jobs available and remote companies that are hiring now.

Explore our site and good luck with your remote job search!

If you find this article helpful, kindly share it with your friends. You may also Pin the above image on your Pinterest account. Thanks!

---

Did you enjoy this article?